Peer Reviewed Articles on Newer Venitlation Modes 2016 2017

  • Journal Listing
  • Exhale (Sheff)
  • v.xiii(two); 2017 Jun
  • PMC5467868

Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Jun; 13(2): 84–98.

Trends in mechanical ventilation: are we ventilating our patients in the best possible way?

Raffaele L. Dellaca'

1Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria – DEIB, Politecnico di Milano Academy, Milan, Italy

Chiara Veneroni

aneDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione due east Bioingegneria – DEIB, Politecnico di Milano Academy, Milan, Italy

Ramon Farre'

iiUnitat de Biofísica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Kingdom of spain

3CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

This review addresses how the combination of physiology, medicine and engineering science principles contributed to the evolution and advancement of mechanical ventilation, emphasising the most urgent needs for comeback and the most promising directions of time to come development.

Several aspects of mechanical ventilation are introduced, highlighting on 1 side the importance of interdisciplinary research for further development and, on the other, the importance of grooming physicians sufficiently on the technological aspects of modernistic devices to exploit properly the great complexity and potentials of this handling.

Educational aims

  • To learn how mechanical ventilation developed in contempo decades and to provide a better agreement of the actual applied science and practice.

  • To learn how and why interdisciplinary research and competences are necessary for providing the best ventilation treatment to patients.

  • To understand which are the nearly relevant technical limitations in modern mechanical ventilators that can touch on their performance in delivery of the treatment.

  • To better sympathize and classify ventilation modes.

  • To acquire the classification, benefits, drawbacks and time to come perspectives of automatic ventilation tailoring algorithms.

Short abstract

Physiology, medicine and engineering principles accept contributed to the advancement of mechanical ventilation http://ow.ly/Fjlb30bFpLl

Introduction

Even though the concept of mechanical ventilation dates back to the 14th century with Vesalius [one], it is only in the concluding century that it has been widely introduced into routine clinical do. Since their initial appearance, mechanical ventilators take become more than sophisticated and expanded their application from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the respiratory medicine ward and even to patients' homes for long-term treatments. This was the outcome of combining the advances in our understanding of respiratory physiology, pathophysiology and clinical direction of patients together with technological progress in mechanical, electronic and biomedical applied science.

Nowadays, this evolution is withal rapid, with new devices and an increased number of ventilation modes and strategies beingness introduced to improve outcomes, patient–ventilator interactions and patient care. Applied science has played and is still playing a relevant role in this process, not only in improving the technical functioning of the ventilators just also in contributing to a better understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology, and of how different ventilation strategies interact with the respiratory system.

This review addresses how the combination of physiology, medicine and engineering principles has contributed to the development and advocacy of mechanical ventilation, highlighting the open issues and the most urgent needs for comeback with a view on the most promising directions of future development.

Evolution of mechanical ventilation

The employ of mechanical tools to assist ventilation dates dorsum to the tardily 19th century, when devices able to utilise an alternating subatmospheric pressure around the torso were used to restore ventilation past expanding the breast wall of patients [two]. Notwithstanding, it was simply after the introduction of positive-force per unit area ventilation during the reappearance of poliomyelitis in the 1950s, when Bjorn Ibsen demonstrated a dramatic reduction of bloodshed in patients manually ventilated by tracheostomy, that mechanical ventilation started to be widespread [three].

The first positive-pressure level mechanical ventilators became available in 1940. Though characterised by a meaning degree of sophistication, they were able to evangelize just a pre-set tidal volume at a given respiratory rate (volume-control ventilation mode) with no or very express capability to monitor ventilation variables (figure 1a).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is EDU-0078-2017.01.jpg

Evolution of the concept of mechanical ventilation. a) The start mechanical ventilators were not equipped with sensors. b) Mechanical ventilators monitor all the ventilation parameters, allowing both closed-loop control of the generated waveform and providing information to the clinicians. c) Mechanical ventilators monitor the condition of the patients and automatically accommodate the ventilatory parameters on the basis of patients' needs.

At that time, respiratory physiology had already established its foundations and was apace growing. The application of mathematical modelling to draw the relationships between flow and pressure (a wonderful example of what today would be considered a biomedical engineering approach), which marked the dawn of the mechanics of breathing, was introduced by Dixon and Brodie [4] in 1903, who modelled the lung as resistance and compliance. Rohrer [v] introduced a relevant simplification by considering only ane force per unit area across the lung and one across the chest wall in 1915 (modelling confirmed past Grandead et al. [6] in 1970), improving our capability to depict and understanding the mechanics of the respiratory system during both physiological and artificial breaths. Rahn et al. [7] introduced pressure level–book diagrams of the lung and thorax, and the concept of relaxation curves, in 1946, creating the groundwork for the evolution of respiratory energetics. These and other studies constituted the physiological background that lead to the introduction of positive-pressure ventilation into clinical do.

The main objective of mechanical ventilation was originally focused on restoring patients' ventilation. This concept expanded equally the other variables determining gas exchange were understood. Ashbaugh et al. [viii] first described astute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 1967 and identified the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) equally "almost helpful in combating atelectasis and hypoxæmia". During the same menstruation, fauna studies showing oxygen toxicity when a high inspiratory oxygen fraction (F IO2 ) was used suggested increasing ventilation instead of F IO2 to care for hypoxaemia, leading to the (ab)apply of increased tidal volume (V T).

From the early 1970s, ventilators benefited from the progresses in electronics, and started incorporating more than avant-garde monitoring of menstruum and pressure variables (figure 1b). Improvements in monitoring also immune the possibility of using existent-time variables to control the action of the machine, with the intermittent mandatory ventilation fashion opening the development of assisted mechanical ventilation as a way to manage the weaning of patients from periods of volume-controlled ventilation [9].

In the meantime, our understanding of the mechanics of breathing further improved cheers to the introduction of the concept of dynamic compression in airways during forced expiration past Fry, Hyatt and co-workers [10]; three-dimensional analysis of pressure, menstruum and volume curves [10, xi]; and a meliorate understanding of chest wall mechanics from Campbell's diagram for the partitioning of elastic and resistive work [12], and the two-compartment model of the breast wall by Gonno and Mead [13].

In 1974, Webb and Tierney [fourteen] demonstrated in fauna models that ventilation with loftier distending pressures was leading per se to severe or even fatal pulmonary oedema, marking the beginning of a decades-long research effort aimed at understanding the adverse effects of mechanical ventilation and the mechanisms involved, and identifying appropriate strategies for preventing ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI), which despite the huge progress made so far, is still an open up upshot. Since so, major attention has been given to identifying the optimal ventilation strategy as a compromise between normalisation of blood gases and avoiding the development of VILI, resulting in the introduction of improved technologies for monitoring ventilation and lung conditions and the introduction of new avant-garde ventilation modes.

This progress was too possible cheers to the introduction of microprocessors in mechanical ventilators, starting in the early 1980s. Microprocessors are silicon electronic circuits able to execute programs; therefore, they can provide very complex functions that tin can be easily inverse by selecting different programs, allowing a mod mechanical ventilator to chop-chop modify its behaviour (due east.g. changing from a volume-control to a pressure level-command or a pressure level-aid ventilation fashion only by selecting unlike control algorithms executed past the device). In addition, microprocessors allow the implementation of sophisticated signal processing of the measurements provided by sensors, leading non only to better measurement accuracy and better rejection of noise and artefacts, merely besides to the generation of new data by appropriately computing and integrating several variables. Moreover, this expanded information can exist used past the ventilator itself to optimise the ventilation parameters on the basis of patient needs, creating the and so-called "airtight-loop" ventilation strategies or intelligent or smart ventilation modes (figure 1c).

The mechanical ventilator: the challenge of delivering accurate ventilation

Once a ventilation strategy is defined, the ventilator should deliver it to the patient in the nigh accurate way. To accomplish this, the machine must sense all variables that ascertain the animate design with high accuracy and adjust its action in real time. Modern ventilators achieve this by combining cut-edge engineering science of actuators, sensors and digital electronics together with sophisticated information processing algorithms. The basic components of a typical mechanical ventilator are shown in figure 2.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is EDU-0078-2017.02.jpg

Basic structure and main functional components of a mechanical ventilator. ETT: endotracheal tube.

Pneumatic unit

The force per unit area source provides the energy required to overcome the elastic and resistive load imposed by the patient's respiratory organization, and information technology is used to reduce their work of breathing. The pressurised air is mixed with the appropriate amount of oxygen past the blender, and delivered to the patient by fast valves that modulate the amount of gas flowing to and from the patient. Thanks to the recent progress in electronics and electrical motors, instead of using valves, in some modern ventilators a fast-response, brushless-driven turbine acts as a variable pressurised air source, making the device independent of centralised medical compressed air distribution just still providing good performance [15].

Sensors

In modern mechanical ventilators, all relevant ventilation variables (pressure, menstruum and F IO2 ) are measured past appropriate sensors that provide information to the control unit of measurement in social club to adjust, in real time, the valves/turbines for delivering the desired ventilation way.

Modern pressure level transducers produce stable, precise and fast measurement of pressure but, despite this, pressure level variables provided past ventilators are at times still outside the tolerance range, even in absenteeism of leaks [sixteen]. Aimed at measuring an extensive variable, menstruum sensors (that besides provide book data by computing the time integral of menses) must exist placed in series with the patient in the breathing circuit and, therefore, are exposed to humidity, condensation and the patient'due south exhalation, making them potential sites of cross-contagion. Moreover, flow meters must guarantee a broad operating range of measurements, loftier accuracy and stability, adequate dynamic response, robustness to changes in gas composition, temperature and vapour condensation, and at the aforementioned fourth dimension, impose a low pneumatic resistance and dead space on the patient.

The demand to improve flow measurement technology is highlighted past the several comparative publications on performance of mechanical ventilators that quite often identify the delivered volume every bit the variable showing the everyman accuracy and repeatability [16–eighteen].

The nearly common approaches to measuring flow include variable-orifice sensors, pneumotachographs or hot-wire anemometers. Promising technologies for the hereafter are micromachined and fibreoptic-based menstruation meters [19]. In detail, thermal flow sensors micromachined on a unmarried silicon chip are already bachelor and used in some mechanical ventilators. They have the advantages of presenting high sensitivity and accurateness, a wide measurement range, fast response, low temperature and gas limerick sensitivity, low dead space and resistance [20], and the product cost could pb, in the future, to the availability of pre-calibrated disposable devices.

Ventilator circuit

Few studies have addressed the touch of ventilator circuits on overall performance in adult ventilation [21–23], while greater attention has been paid to this in paediatric and neonatal ventilation. The small V T of neonatal ventilation makes it crucial to consider the shunt compliance of the circuits when measuring volumes, either past excluding it by measuring menstruation later the circuit at the airways opening or past estimating and digitally compensating for it [24, 25]. Also, specific design of the ventilation circuits improves the transmission of ventilation waveforms to the patient with possible consequences on the overall treatment [26].

Digital signal processing algorithms

Compared to previous generations of mechanical ventilators, the apply of microprocessors allowed the evolution of sophisticated signal processing algorithms to compensate for intrinsic flaws in sensor technologies, consequently improving performance. As a drawback, these algorithms are mostly unknown to the users, who thus cannot empathize or predict the behaviour of the ventilator in situations and conditions different from these considered during the development of the algorithms.

Every bit book measurements are obtained past digital integration of the period signals, the signal processing also significantly contributes to volume accuracy by compensating for drift and leaks, specially during noninvasive ventilation, where leak interpretation and compensation algorithms play a major part. Recent studies have shown that, even if compensation algorithms tin can markedly reduce measurement errors, overall performance are not yet ideal [16, 27] and improvements are still needed, particularly during variable leaks [28].

Maintenance

Even if each mechanical ventilator undergoes accurate calibration and testing before being set in operation, preserving performance over time is the responsibleness of maintenance and servicing procedures, which have not ever shown to exist appropriate [29]. Even when the same model of mechanical ventilator is considered, wide variability in performance betwixt devices has been observed (figures 3 and four), both in the high-end machines used in the ICU [17] and in simpler units for habitation ventilation [30], highlighting the urgency of improving lifetime quality command of such devices, particularly for flow sensors.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is EDU-0078-2017.03.jpg

Measured values of a) inspiratory volume, b) PEEP, c) F IO2 and d) respiratory rate delivered to a test lung by several devices in four intensive intendance units grouped past ventilator model. EVITA4: Draeger Evita 4 (25 machines); SERVOI: Siemens/Maquet Servo I (16 machines); SVC900C: Siemens SV900C (12 machines); SERVO300: Siemens/Maquet Servo 300 (seven machines); EVITAXL: Draeger Evita 40 (iii machines); SV900D: Siemens SV900D (one machine); EVITA2: Draeger Evita 2 (1 machine) and ENGSTROM: GE Engstrom (one machine). Reproduced and modified from [17] with permission from the publisher.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is EDU-0078-2017.04.jpg

Human relationship between the number of unplanned hospital re-admissions of home-ventilated patients in the previous twelvemonth and the index of error of the dwelling ventilator. Reproduced and modified from [xxx] with permission from the publisher.

Ventilation modes

Fifty-fifty if the concept of mechanical ventilation is apparently simple, in that location are near infinite possible patterns of interaction between the ventilator and the patient, namely the modes of ventilation. Originally, the classification of these modes was relatively simple, with "controlled ventilation modes" beingness used when the ventilator was imposing its action to the patient and "assisted ventilation modes" used when the ventilator was supporting the animate of the patient. Yet, since the introduction of microprocessors, the number of modes of ventilation has grown exponentially. Moreover, in addition to the implicit complexity of this thing, many manufacturers accept introduced dissimilar (and often trademarked) names for similar modes, mostly for pursuing marketing and branding strategies, making information technology even more difficult for the user to understand the principles and ideal use of each ventilation mode available on a given ventilator.

This is a relevant event that probably deserves more attending in order to improve our ability to provide the best ventilation to our patients, whichever ventilator is used. Starting in 1992, Robert Chatburn developed a structured approach that lead to a well-defined and structured taxonomy to proper name ventilation modes depending on their essential features, making it possible to understand the features of a ventilation modality from its name [31].

Chatburn'due south arroyo (figure 5) is based on the definition of a style of mechanical ventilation as the combination of three elements:

  • ane) the ventilator breath control variable

  • 2) the breath sequence

  • three) the targeting scheme

They used 10 maxims to progressively depict how to classify a given ventilation mode by understanding what it does (table 1). Menstruum charts are likewise proposed to advise a procedure for classifying a given ventilation fashion by applying the maxims. Unfortunately, the introduction of such a structured taxonomy into clinical practice requires relevant and simultaneous efforts both in the educational programmes of medical schools and in the implementation of this naming approach in the ventilators past the manufacturers. This is unlikely to occur without a firm and combined endeavor from all medical societies of anaesthesia, intensive care and respiratory medicine, which is still lacking.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.  Object name is EDU-0078-2017.05.jpg

Construction of the ventilation mode taxonomy suggested by Chatburn. The proper name of a ventilation fashion results from three elements. CMV: continuous mandatory ventilation; IMV: intermittent mandatory ventilation; CSV: continuous spontaneous ventilation. Reproduced and modified from [31] with permission from the publisher.

Tabular array 1

Chatburns' maxims for understanding ventilator functioning

A breath is i cycle of positive flow (inspiration) and negative flow (expiration) defined in terms of the flow versus time curve
A breath is assisted if the ventilator provides some or all of the work of breathing
A ventilator assists animate using either force per unit area command or volume control based on the equation of motion for the respiratory system
Breaths are classified co-ordinate to the criteria that trigger (kickoff) and cycle (stop) inspiration
Trigger and wheel events can be either patient initiated or ventilator initiated
Breaths are classified equally spontaneous or mandatory based on both the trigger and wheel events
Ventilators deliver three basic breath sequences: CMV, IMV and CSV
Ventilators evangelize v basic ventilatory patterns: VC-CMV, VC-IMV, PC-CMV, PC-IMV and PC-CSV
Within each ventilatory pattern, there are several types that can exist distinguished by their targeting schemes (set-point, dual, biovariable, servo, adaptive, optimal and intelligent)
A manner of ventilation is classified according to its control variable, breath sequence and targeting schemes

CMV: continuous mandatory ventilation; IMV: intermittent mandatory ventilation; CSV: continuous spontaneous ventilation; VC: volume command; PC: pressure level control. Reproduced and modified from [31] with permission from the publisher.

Since in-depth clarification of different ventilation modes is outside the goal of this review, the reader tin find detailed information elsewhere [32]. As most of the contempo innovation in mechanical ventilation is focused in developing new approaches for the implementation of a targeting scheme, the post-obit paragraphs are focused on this topic, using Chatburn's nomenclature equally reference (table 2).

Table 2

Nomenclature of different targeting schemes

Scheme Description Advantage Disadvantage
1) Set-bespeak (s) The operator sets all parameters of the pressure waveform (pressure level control modes) or volume and flow waveforms (volume command modes) Simplicity Irresolute patient conditions may make settings inappropriate
2) Dual (d) The ventilator tin can automatically switch betwixt volume command and pressure control during a single inspiration It tin adjust to irresolute patient conditions and ensure either a pre-set 5 T or tiptop inspiratory pressure, whichever is deemed most important Information technology may be complicated to set correctly and may demand constant readjustment if not automatically controlled past the ventilator
three) Servo (r) The output of the ventilator (pressure/volume/menses) automatically follows a varying input Back up by the ventilator is proportional to inspiratory attempt It requires estimates of artificial airway and/or respiratory organization mechanical properties
iv) Adaptive (a) The ventilator automatically sets target(due south) between breaths in response to varying patient weather condition Information technology can maintain stable 5 T commitment with force per unit area control for changing lung mechanics or patient inspiratory try Automatic adjustment may be inappropriate if algorithm assumptions are violated or if they practice non match physiology
5) Biovariable (b) The ventilator automatically adjusts the inspiratory pressure level or V T randomly Information technology simulates the variability observed during normal breathing and may improve oxygenation or mechanics Manually set range of variability may be inappropriate to reach goals
6) Optimal (o) The ventilator automatically adjusts the targets of the ventilatory pattern to either minimise or maximise some overall performance characteristic (due east.g. piece of work rate of animate) It tin can accommodate to changing lung mechanics or patient inspiratory effort Automatic adjustment may be inappropriate if algorithm assumptions are violated or if they do non match physiology
seven) Intelligent (i) This is a targeting scheme that uses artificial intelligence programmes such every bit fuzzy logic, dominion-based practiced systems and artificial neural networks Information technology can adjust to changing lung mechanics or patient inspiratory effort Automated adjustment may be inappropriate if algorithm assumptions are violated or if they do not friction match physiology

Reproduced and modified from [31] with permission from the publisher.

Targeting schemes 1 and 2: set-betoken and dual schemes

The set-signal and dual schemes are both manual targeting schemes in which the operator directly adjusts the controlled output [33]. The bulk of ventilation modalities is included in this category. These modes tin exist divided into synchronised or non-synchronised ventilation modes.

In synchronised modes, the advances of technologies resulted in improved trigger performance [34–36]. While in adults, the employ of either the patient's flow or force per unit area triggering results in not-clinically pregnant difference in performance [37], in neonatal ventilation, where 5 T is extremely small and respiratory rates loftier, flow triggering improves synchrony [38]. Yet, the patient's triggering is still an open up issue, especially in presence of leaks and during noninvasive ventilation [39, forty].

Targeting scheme 3: servo targeting schemes

Servo targeting ventilation modes are characterised by the ventilator generating an output that follows a varying input in real time. Automatic tube compensation (ATC), neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA), proportional assistance ventilation (PAV) and PAV-plus are examples of this category. They allow high degree of synchrony with patients and support the work of breathing, assigning to the patient'due south neural respiratory control the definition of the ventilation waveform.

ATC mathematically estimates the pressure drop due to the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient flow and continuously adjusts the pressure at the airway opening in order to maintain the pressure level at the tip of the ETT at the set value, compensating (only) for the resistive workload added to the patient past the high resistance of the tube. NAVA measures the electrical action of the diaphragm by transoesophageal electromyography and applies an airway opening pressure proportional to information technology to the patient. It allows improve synchronisation with the patient, the delivery of physiological waveforms and it is robust in case of leaks and machine-PEEP [41, 42]. PAV and PAV-plus back up both the elastic and resistive work of the patient, and are based on the awarding of the equation of motion of the respiratory system, therefore requiring the noesis of the patient'southward respiratory resistance (R dyn) and compliance (C dyn). PAV-plus continuously monitors lung mechanics in order to suit R dyn and C dyn to follow changes in patient's weather condition and resulting in ameliorate operation [33].

Targeting scheme 4: adaptive targeting

Adaptive targeting allows the ventilator to automatically set up one ventilation variable to maintain some other ventilation variable at a predefined value. In this fashion, the ventilator can cope with changes in patient conditions. Examples of ventilation modes using this scheme are: mandatory rate ventilation, in which the inspiratory pressure is modified to maintain the set respiratory frequency; adaptive menstruum/adaptive inspiratory time, in which the inspiratory time and inspiratory flow are automatically adjusted to maintain an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1/2; adaptive pressure level control, in which inspiratory pressure level is adapted to evangelize a target V T regardless of any alter in lung mechanics or patient effort; and mandatory minute ventilation, in which minute ventilation is maintained close to a target value past increasing/decreasing mandatory breaths or past an automatic adjustment of the inspiratory pressure. It is worthy to underline that these ventilation modes cannot be considered forms of automated weaning [33].

Targeting scheme five: biovariable targeting

Variable ventilation is a ventilation modality that provides a variable V T or peak pressure by adding random fluctuations to the set value in social club to mimic the natural variability of the respiration. The rationale is based on the racket-enhanced amplification of a useful signal in a nonlinear system by stochastic resonance. Indeed, including appropriately designed noise in mechanical ventilators improves gas exchange [43]. Moreover, variability in the respiratory system has been plant to be important for cell activity, as it positively modulates surfactant secretion [44, 45]; it is also related to the maturation of breathing control in infants [46, 47] and correlates with weaning success [48–50]. Creature studies have shown that variability improves ventilation efficiency and lung compliance in the preterm lung without increasing lung inflammation or lung injury [51, 52].

Adjusting mechanical ventilation for patients' condition and needs: optimal and intelligent targeting schemes

When, in 1998, Dreyfuss and Saumon demonstrated that the key ventilation variable responsible for the development of VILI is not the absolute pressure level applied to the lung only the V T, it became clear that, in gild to avoid VILI, the settings of ventilator parameters must exist accurately tailored to the individual patient. Still, fifty-fifty if the Five T was physiologically corrected by adjusting it for body weight, many patients were injured anyway. A significant advancement in our understanding of VILI was provided by the utilize of computed tomography (CT) to study ARDS. Information technology was thanks to CT scans that nosotros learned that ARDS is not a homogeneous, simply a highly heterogeneous, disease [53, 54]. 3-dimensional lung images showed that in a diseased lung, in that location are nonaerated regions due to either a complete filling of the alveolar spaces with liquid and cells, and/or to the collapse of potentially recruitable pulmonary units (atelectasis) [55]. This has major consequences in tailoring mechanical ventilation: a V T estimated from the torso size of a given patient might be excessive as the actual aerated lung can be much smaller than its anatomical dimensions (a concept chosen "baby lung"). The translation of this concept to clinical exercise was demonstrated by the ARDSNet trial in 2000, in which a significant reduction of mortality was shown when a V T of 6 mL⋅kg−i was used instead of 12 mL⋅kg−1 [56]. This and other studies underlined the importance of applying a lung-protective ventilation strategy in which the minimisation of side-effects of ventilation gains priority when applying this treatment. Notwithstanding, fifty-fifty if we now understand much more of the pathophysiology of ventilation, we are yet non able to fully implement these concepts in the clinical practice. For example, we learned that ventilation parameters should be adjusted on the amount of the aerated lung of the patient and not simply on his/her body weight. However, the size of the ventilated lung changes from patient to patient and in the same patient with fourth dimension. Moreover, as role of the nonaerated regions can be due to atelectasis, the application of different PEEP, ventilatory patterns and lung volume history can markedly bear on the dimension of the baby lung by recruiting or de-recruiting atelectatic regions, thus making the baby lung size a highly dynamic variable and not a static one [57, 58], thus requiring continuous adjustment of ventilator parameters. Therefore, PEEP should be optimised aiming to maximise the fraction of recruited lung [59, 60], thus reducing inspiratory pressures as much as possible to minimise over-distention of lung tissues [56]. Unfortunately, the only clinically bachelor validated applied science for assessing lung volume recruitment is CT, which is obviously unsuitable for long-term bedside monitoring.

This highlights the importance of both a proper understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and quantification of related relevant variables in optimising ventilation. Similar reasoning applies to other specific weather condition, such as the presence of intrinsic PEEP in obstructed patients and the controlled unloading of the respiratory muscles during weaning.

Even if these physiopathology concepts are now well understood, the fundamental variables needed to tailor ventilation are not yet measurable at the bedside, leading to a significant gap between what we know nigh an platonic ventilation strategy and what can be applied in the clinic. For this reason, inquiry efforts have been devoted in recent years to improving technologies for assessing physiological variables at the bedside and to comprise into mechanical ventilators these enhanced monitoring capabilities for providing the clinicians with the information needed to properly tailor mechanical ventilation. Moreover, availability of measurements of specific physiological variables enables the implementation of automatic tailoring algorithms.

Monitoring physiological weather condition

Pressure at the airway opening, ventilation volumes and F IO2 are monitored past all modern mechanical ventilators. Beside oxygenation, which tin can be easily measured at bedside past pulse oximetry, distribution of lung ventilation and mechanics are among the most relevant variables for optimising ventilation. Therefore, recently developed noninvasive techniques for lung function monitoring are now becoming available in mechanical ventilators, allowing bedside monitoring of new relevant variable for optimising ventilation.

Monitoring distribution of ventilation: electrical impedance tomography

Afterwards decades of research, electrical imperdance tomography (EIT) is now commercially available to monitor the pattern of regional ventilation of the lungs during mechanical ventilation, and to show how it changes by modifying ventilation fashion and parameters [61]. Recent studies showed that EIT can exist an constructive tool to titrate optimal PEEP [62–65].

Lung mechanics: forced oscillation technique

With the forced oscillation technique (FOT), a small-amplitude, high-frequency oscillatory pressure is applied to the airway opening, and the study of the relationship betwixt the applied pressure and the resulting flow at unlike frequencies (the so-chosen respiratory impedance) allows the characterisation of specific features of the lung mechanical properties, even in presence of spontaneous breathing and without requiring oesophageal manometry [66]. In particular, recent studies have demonstrated potential usefulness of FOT for monitoring lung mechanics during mechanical ventilation [67–70], proved that it is sensitive and specific to changes in peripheral lung mechanics [71–73], and showed that FOT can be used as bedside tool for monitoring recruitment/derecruitment [74]. Specifically, monitoring lung mechanics by FOT during a decremental PEEP trial allows the identification of the open-lung PEEP, defined as the minimum PEEP level required to prevent lung derecruitment afterward a recruitment manoeuvre, with high sensitivity and specificity when compared with CT [75, 76]. FOT may also be a useful tool for optimising PEEP in obstructed patients as it allows the monitoring of the presence of tidal expiratory flow limitation [71, 72] and, in general, can be used to monitor the status and evolution of respiratory mechanics in the ventilated patient.

These are only examples of how cutting-border technologies have resulted in new monitoring tools for optimising ventilation. Other physiological variables and measurement technologies have been studied for monitoring blood gases, lung mechanics, proinflammatory mediators, etc. [77].

Computational tools

The idea of automating mechanical ventilation was suggested in 1957 [78]. The rationale of "intelligent" ventilators is to better patient management past analysing and integrating data coming from large number of sources, and guaranteeing continuous adjustment of the ventilation fifty-fifty when skillful personnel are non constantly available, improving patients' handling and minimising clinical errors. Moreover, these tools can be also used for educational purposes.

However, ventilation direction is a circuitous procedure involving the analysis of multiple parameters, subjective strategies and multiple goals (gas commutation, lung protection and weaning). Physiology, every bit well as the peculiarity of the pathology, must be taken into account, several clinical data must be gathered from many sources and the condition of the patient must be monitored continuously. Finally, priorities of goals, clinical preferences and local clinical protocols must be besides considered.

Until now, different variables have been considered equally input for optimising ventilation strategies. They include variables describing the general status of the patients, haemodynamic variables, gas exchange, lung mechanics and the work of breathing [79]. When implementing these strategies in mechanical ventilators, at that place is the demand to identify a merchandise-off between the consummate description of the patient condition and the complexity of managing many variables, availability of the data, invasiveness of measurements and conquering of data from different equipment.

The aforementioned can be said for the output variables: the simplest system controls only ane variable. This is the case for algorithms that accommodate F IO2 to maintain target saturation. Ideally, on the basis of the condition of the patient, algorithms should exist able to control not only a single variable simply all the ventilator settings and even suggest specific manoeuvres or pharmacological treatments to the clinician.

Technology has developed several computational tools that commencement from a set up of input (measured) variables and tin can determine the desired outputs (settings) [79]. They include mathematical models and classical controllers (east.g. proportional, integrative and derivative controllers), rule-based practiced systems (due east.g. systems that use coded clinical protocols), and other bogus intelligence techniques (fuzzy logic, neural networks and genetic algorithms) or hybrid systems (combinations of the same systems). All these engineering technologies tin can be used to model the cardiorespiratory system and/or the decisional process of the clinicians to automatically identify an optimal ventilation strategy.

Mathematical models have the advantage of describing pathophysiological processes. However, in club to be patient-specific, the identification of the parameters of the model is required. This is often difficult every bit these parameters are commonly non measurable with noninvasive techniques and estimation errors, beingness unavoidable, must be considered. Classical command science controllers are normally used to modify one or few ventilator parameters to maintain i or few physiological variables within a predefined range.

Rule-based expert systems are built using the available ventilation protocols and clinician expertise. They have the disadvantages of existence related to protocols that may be subjective and specific for single centres.

Artificial intelligence techniques practice not crave modelling the arrangement on a mechanistic basis. They are able to handle large number of variables and they can be trained on large existing data sets. As a limitation, their outputs are hard to predict every bit they are determined past the complex interaction of many rules.

All these tools have been and are currently applied to implement both open up-loop (decision support) systems and closed-loop systems. Closed-loop systems have the major advantage of allowing a continuous adaptation of ventilation to the patient without requiring the intervention of clinicians. However, as they employ changes to a patient's therapy without involving, or at least requiring, the acquittance of a clinician, they open up serious issues of safe and accountability [79] that will require, in some countries, compliance with electric current legislation.

Targeting scheme half-dozen: optimal targeting schemes

These schemes let automatic adjustment of ventilator settings to either minimise or maximise some overall operation characteristic. Different optimal targeting schemes take been proposed in the literature [79]. They include:

  • schemes involving a simple controller used for the automatic adjustment of F IOii to maintain patient saturation inside an optimal range, or to adjust inspiratory pressure or minute ventilation on the footing of carbon dioxide exchange

  • more complex procedures including mathematical models and explicit objective functions for optimising more than than 1 variable (due east.g. optimising respiratory rate, 5 T, inspiratory/expiratory fourth dimension and PEEP for minimising the elastance of the respiratory system and regulating end-tidal carbon dioxide)

A ventilation modality available in commercial mechanical ventilators that follows this scheme is adaptive support ventilation (ASV). ASV is designed to minimise the piece of work of breathing. Its inputs are trunk weight, F IOii , PEEP and %MV to exist supported by the machine, and the target is to automatically adjust respiratory rate and V T, considering resistance, compliance and auto-PEEP. Some skilful rules are used to maintain frequency and V T in safe ranges and reduce the risk of motorcar-PEEP. Because of these rules, ASV can be better classified equally a grade of hybrid scheme that combines mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence. Studies accept shown that ASV tin can select specific Five T and respiratory rate settings [80] to attain the same arterial partial force per unit area of carbon dioxide equally the clinicians do and allowing weaning automation [81].

The new modality Intellivent-ASV adds to the ASV controller (ventilation controller) an oxygenation controller that adjusts PEEP and F IOii , depending on the ARDS network tables to maintain oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (S pO2 ) within a pre-prepare range. Moreover, it includes a test for probing weaning readiness of patients [82].

Targeting scheme 7: intelligent targeting schemes

Several systems were described in literature for setting ventilation parameters based on some form of artificial intelligence. Examples of this targeting scheme are a fuzzy-logic arrangement used for F IOtwo control, or for optimising respiratory rate and V T on the basis of lung mechanics, S pOtwo , carbon dioxide, body temperature, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and the patient's body weight and height or to implement the "open-lung approach"; and bogus neural networks, genetic algorithms, fuzzy-logic systems and their combination for the support of ventilation management specific to some common lung pathologies [79].

Studies applying rule-based expert systems include those by Fiftyaubscher et al. [83], which was included in the development of ASV, and Dojat et al. [84], which was integrated in a commercial ventilator under the proper noun of Smartcare. Smartcare is a rule-based expert arrangement for automatic control of pressure support ventilation. It processes respiratory rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide, pressure support and V T. Information technology aims to maintain the patient in a "comfort zone" defined by a combination of V T, respiratory frequency and end-tidal carbon dioxide, and to progressively subtract the inspiratory pressure. Studies assessing the impact of using this ventilation mode found that information technology has ameliorate or similar operation to weaning managed by experienced personnel [85–89]. However, it is not well suited for patients with depression spontaneous breathing activity or during worsening of airway obstacle [82].

Educational perspective

This review has mainly focused on describing how the combination of physiology, medicine and engineering concepts and tools are being used to improve mechanical ventilation. To become further, 2 kinds of advancements are required. The first is the development of cost-effective, accurate, miniaturised and reliable sensors to measure patient variables (e.g. pressure, flow and oxygenation) and actuators to build machines reliably providing the desired pressure/menstruum to patients (e.g. blowers and valves). The 2d is the application of mathematical models, control systems and artificial intelligence to tailor the action of the mechanical ventilator to each patient's needs. While progress in sensors and actuators is more often than not a technological issue (relatively contained of respiratory pathophysiology), application of control/intelligence tools to the specific case of mechanical ventilation is something that goes across the pure discipline of engineering, since it requires a deep knowledge of the pathophysiology of the respiratory organisation. This is a challenging job that must be carried out past a truly interdisciplinary approach, joining the knowledge and expertise of bioengineers and physicians. Although this kind of arroyo has already been followed "informally" since the beginning of mechanical ventilation, interdisciplinary efforts are more and more necessary equally the complexity of modern mechanical ventilators increases equally these machines are among the about complex medical devices in terms of integrating and controlling a diversity of input and output variables.

Information technology goes without proverb that bioengineers focused on designing and building mechanical ventilators must be deeply educated on respiratory pathophysiology. However, it is nowadays not then obvious that physicians dealing with mechanical ventilation take been sufficiently educated on the technological aspects of these complex medical devices. Physicians attending patients nether acute or chronic mechanical ventilation are faced with considerable difficulties to properly understand how these devices piece of work. As mentioned before in this review, a major difficulty is the intrinsic complication of modern control/intelligence algorithms implemented in current devices. This difficulty is increased by the lack of standardisation and the fact that, for marketing and commercial strategies, companies building ventilators tend to add new definitions of ventilation modes and variants without disclosing the algorithms with sufficient item for the user to actually empathise how the car is working. The result is that in most cases the doc is using a sort of "black box" as therapeutic device. Appropriately, it seems necessary that, when being specifically trained to utilize mechanical ventilation, physicians should exist as well provided with a sufficient didactics on the technological issues involved in these mod medical devices. In that way, they volition be in optimal professional person conditions to select the best therapeutic choice for each individual patient.

Conclusions

Patients' needs are irresolute with time considering of the evolution of both pathology severity and treatments. Therefore, an optimal ventilation strategy is an adaptive process aiming to care for the acute condition and either back up the gradual weaning from the ventilator or adjust to the natural fluctuations of chronic disorders. Such a tailoring could improve outcomes and comfort, reduce agin events, and avoid prolonging ventilation, with its associated risks and costs. To achieve these goals, advancement of our understanding in pathophysiology, medicine and applied science must be combined with an interdisciplinary approach to fully address the complication of mechanical ventilation for further improving patients' handling.

Educational questions

  1. Ventilation variables displayed by mechanical ventilators are e'er within the accurateness limits declared past manufacturers

    • a) True

    • b) False

    • c) But at the offset of their life cycle

  2. Ventilation style names indicated by modern mechanical ventilators uniquely identify the characteristics of the fashion

    • a) Yes, all ventilators use only standardised names

    • b) No, in that location might be different names for the aforementioned mode as manufacturers are not obliged to utilize a standardised taxonomy

    • c) Only intensive care unit of measurement ventilators are required to apply a standardised taxonomy

  3. The engineering of a sensor fully characterises its performance

    • a) Yeah

    • b) Only in modern mechanical ventilators

    • c) No, in mod mechanical ventilators the use of different data processing algorithms can lead to very different overall performance of the same sensor technology

    • d) Only for menses sensors

  4. The difference between an optimal and an intelligent targeting scheme is

    • a) The optimal targeting scheme identifies the best ventilation setting while the intelligent scheme, the all-time ventilation mode

    • b) The optimal targeting scheme adjust ventilation parameters in order to maximise or minimise a comprehensive physiological characteristic such as work of breathing, while the intelligent scheme uses artificial intelligence tools to optimise the ventilation settings on the ground of coded cognition

    • c) The two terms refer to the aforementioned approach

  5. In mechanical ventilators, the difficulty to provide accurate measurements of the ventilation variables is usually:

    • a) Similar for all variables

    • b) Higher for volumes compared to pressure, F IOii and time

    • c) Lower for pressure compared to volume

    • d) College for pressure compared to F IOii and time

Suggested answers

  1. c.

  2. b.

  3. c.

  4. b.

  5. b.

Disclosures

Footnotes

References

ane. Vesalius A. De humani corporis fabrica. 1543.

2. Dalziel J. On sleep and appliance for promoting artificial respiration. Br Assoc Adv Sci 1838; 2: 127–134. [Google Scholar]

3. Lassen HCA. A preliminary report on the 1952 epidemic of poliomyelitis in Copenhagen with special reference to the treatment of acute respiratory insufficiency. Lancet 1953; 1: 37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

iv. Dixon WE, Brodie TG. Contributions to the physiology of the lungs: Part I. The bronchial muscles, their innervation, and the action of drugs upon them. J Physiol 1903; 29: 97–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Rohrer F. Der Zusammenhang der Atemkräfte und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Dehnungszustand der Atmungsorgane. Pflügers Curvation Eur J Physiol 1916; 165: 419–444. [Google Scholar]

6. Mead J, Takishima T, Leith D. Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol 1970; 28: 596–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

vii. Rahn H, Otis AB, Chadwick LE, et al. . The pressure level-volume diagram of the thorax and lung. Am J Physiol 1946; 146: 167–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, et al. . Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 1967; two: 319–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ix. Downs JB, Klein EF, Desautels D, et al. . Intermittent mandatory ventilation: a new arroyo to weaning patients from mechanical ventilators. Chest 1973; 64: 331–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Fry DL, Hyatt RE. Pulmonary mechanics. A unified analysis of the human relationship between pressure, volume and gasflow in the lungs of normal and diseased human being subjects. Am J Med 1960; 29: 672–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Hyatt RE, Schilder DP, Fry DL. Human relationship between maximum expiratory menstruation and degree of lung inflation. J Appl Physiol 1958; 13: 331–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Campbell E. The Respiratory Muscles and the Mechanics of Animate. London, Lloyd-Luke, 1958. [Google Scholar]

thirteen. Konno 1000, Mead J. Measurement of the split volume changes of rib cage and abdomen during breathing. J Appl Physiol 1967; 22: 407–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Webb HH, Tierney DF. Experimental pulmonary edema due to intermittent positive pressure ventilation with high inflation pressures. Protection past positive end-expiratory force per unit area. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 110: 556–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

fifteen. Thille AW, Lyazidi A, Richard J-CM, et al. . A bench study of intensive-intendance-unit ventilators : New versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators ventilators. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1368–1376. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Garnier Thou, Quesnel C, Fulgencio J-P, et al. . Multifaceted bench comparative evaluation of latest intensive care unit of measurement ventilators. Thompson JP, editor. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Govoni L, Dellaca RL, Penuelas O, et al. . Actual performance of mechanical ventilators in ICU: A multicentric quality control written report. Med Devices Evid Res 2012; 5: 111–119. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Leipälä JA, Iwasaki S, Milner A, et al. . Accuracy of the book and pressure displays of high frequency oscillators. Curvation Dis Kid Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F174–F176. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Schena E, Massaroni C, Saccomandi P, et al. . Period measurement in mechanical ventilation: a review. Med Eng Phys 2015; 37: 257–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Silvestri S, Schena E. Micromachined flow sensors in biomedical applications. 2012; 3: 225–243. [Google Scholar]

21. Hess D, McCurdy Southward, Simmons M. Compression volume in adult ventilator circuits: a comparison of five disposable circuits and a nondisposable circuit. Respir Care 1991; 36: 1113–1118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Disposable developed breathing circuits for utilise with critical care ventilators. Health Devices 1994; 23: 104–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Wang JS, Hung WT, Lin CY. Leakage of dispensable breathing circuits. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4: 111–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Castle RA, Dunne CJ, Mok Q, et al. . Accurateness of displayed values of tidal book in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2566–2574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Cannon ML, Cornell J, Tripp-Hamel DS, et al. . Tidal volumes for ventilated infants should exist adamant with a pneumotachometer placed at the endotracheal tube. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 2109–2112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Wheeler KI, Moore GP, Morley CJ, et al. . Comparison of 2 ventilator circuits for Drager Babylog loftier-frequency ventilation. J Paediatr Child Health 2011; 47: 211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Itagaki T, Bennett DJ, Chenelle CT, et al. . Performance of leak compensation in all-historic period ICU ventilators during book-targeted neonatal ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care 2017; 62: 10–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Lujan M, Sogo A, Grimau C, et al. . Influence of dynamic leaks in volume-targeted pressure back up noninvasive ventilation: a bench report. Respir Care 2015; 60: 191–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Beydon L, Liu N, Hassapopoulos J, et al. . Exam of 20 similar intensive care ventilators in daily use weather condition--evaluation of accurateness and performances. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18: 32–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Farré R, Navajas D, Prats E, et al. . Performance of mechanical ventilators at the patient's habitation: a multicentre quality control study. Thorax 2006; 61: 400–404. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Chatburn RL, El-Khatib M, Mireles-Cabodevila E. A taxonomy for mechanical ventilation: 10 fundamental maxims. Respir Care 2014; 59: 1747–1763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Cairo JM. Mosby'southward Respiratory Care Equipment. Amsterdam, Elsevier Wellness Sciences, 2013. [Google Scholar]

33. Chatburn RL, Mireles-Cabodevila E. Closed-loop control of mechanical ventilation: clarification and classification of targeting schemes. Respir Care 2011; 56: 85–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Richard J-C, Carlucci A, Breton Fifty, et al. . Bench testing of pressure level back up ventilation with 3 dissimilar generations of ventilators. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1049–1057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Thille AW, Lyazidi A, Richard J-CM, et al. . A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1368–1376. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Takeuchi M, Williams P, Hess D, et al. . Continuous positive airway pressure in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 162–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Kondili E. Patient-ventilator interaction. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 106–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Keszler M. Land of the art in conventional mechanical ventilation. J Perinatol 2009; 29: 262–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Oto J, Chenelle CT, Marchese Advertizement, et al. . A comparing of leak compensation in acute care ventilators during noninvasive and invasive ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care 2013; 58: 2027–2037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

forty. Stell IANM, Paul G, Lee KC, et al. . Noninvasive ventilator triggering in chronic a test lung comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 2092–2097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Lellouche F, Brochard L. Avant-garde closed loops during mechanical ventilation (PAV, NAVA, ASV, SmartCare). Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23: 81–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Branson RD, Johannigman JA. Innovations in mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2009; 54: 933–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Suki B, Alencar AM, Sujeer MK, et al. . Life-support system benefits from noise. Nature 1998; 393: 127–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Arold SP, Suki B, Alencar AM, et al. . Variable ventilation induces endogenous surfactant release in normal guinea pigs. Am J Physiol Lung Jail cell Mol Physiol 2003; 285: L370–L375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Arold SP, Bartolák-Suki Eastward, Suki B. Variable stretch pattern enhances surfactant secretion in alveolar type II cells in culture. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009; 296: L574–L581. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Frey U, Silverman M, Barabási AL, et al. . Irregularities and power police distributions in the animate pattern in preterm and term infants. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85: 789–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Engoren M, Courtney SE, Habib RH. Event of weight and age on respiratory complexity in premature neonates. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 766–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Wysocki M, Cracco C, Teixeira A, et al. . Reduced breathing variability as a predictor of unsuccessful patient separation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2076–2083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Kaczmarek J, Kamlin COF, Morley CJ, et al. . Variability of respiratory parameters and extubation readiness in ventilated neonates. Curvation Dis Kid Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98: F70–F73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Engoren 1000. Gauge entropy of respiratory charge per unit and tidal book during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1817–1823. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Berry CA, Suki B, Polglase GR, et al. . Variable ventilation enhances ventilation without exacerbating injury in preterm lambs with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res 2012; 72: 384–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Pillow JJ, Musk GC, McLean CM, et al. . Variable ventilation improves ventilation and lung compliance in preterm lambs. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1352–1359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. Gattinoni L, Mascheroni D, Torresin A, et al. . Morphological response to positive end expiratory force per unit area in acute respiratory failure. Computerized tomography study. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12: 137–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Maunder RJ, Shuman WP, McHugh JW, et al. . Preservation of normal lung regions in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Analysis by computed tomography. JAMA 1986; 255: 2463–2465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Giraud F, et al. . Computed tomography cess of footing-glass opacity: semiology and significance. J Thorac Imaging 1993; 8: 249–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network,Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Crotti S, Mascheroni D, Caironi P, et al. . Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 131–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Pelosi P, Goldner Yard, McKibben A, et al. . Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 122–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1334–1349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

lx. Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre Northward, et al. . Higher versus lower positive terminate-expiratory pressures in patients with the astute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 327–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Gong B, Krueger-Ziolek S, Moeller K, et al. . Electrical impedance tomography : functional lung imaging on its style to clinical exercise? Expert Rev Respir Med 2015; 9: 721–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Wolf GK, Gómez-Laberge C, Rettig JS, et al. . Mechanical ventilation guided by electric impedance tomography in experimental acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1296–1304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Liu S, Tan L, Möller K, et al. . Identification of regional overdistension, recruitment and cyclic alveolar collapse with electrical impedance tomography in an experimental ARDS model. Crit Care 2016; 20: 119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. Muders T, Luepschen H, Zinserling J, et al. . Tidal recruitment assessed past electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography in a porcine model of lung injury. Crit Care Med 2012; twoscore: 903–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

65. Costa EL Five, Borges JB, Melo A, et al. . Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension past electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1132–1137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Kaczka DW, Dellacà RL. Oscillation mechanics of the respiratory organisation: applications to lung illness. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2011; 39: 337–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

67. Farre R, Ferrer M, Rotger M, et al. . Servocontrolled generator to mensurate respiratory impedance from 0.25 to 26 Hz in ventilated patients at different PEEP levels. Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 1222–1227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

68. Bellardine CL, Ingenito EP, Hoffman A, et al. . Heterogeneous airway versus tissue mechanics and their relation to gas commutation part during mechanical ventilation. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 626–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Kaczka DW, Hager DN, Hawley ML, et al. . Quantifying mechanical heterogeneity in canine acute lung injury: impact of mean airway force per unit area. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 306–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. Kaczka DW, Brown RH, Mitzner Westward. Assessment of heterogeneous airway constriction in dogs: a construction-part analysis. J Appl Physiol 2008; 106: 520–530. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

71. Dellacà RL, Rotger M, Aliverti A, et al. . Noninvasive detection of expiratory flow limitation in COPD patients during nasal CPAP. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 983–991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Dellaca RL, Santus P, Aliverti A, et al. . Detection of expiratory menses limitation in COPD using the forced oscillation technique. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 332–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. Johnson MK, Birch M, Carter R, et al. . Utilize of reactance to gauge transpulmonary resistance. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 1061–1069. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

74. Dellaca RL, Andersson Olerud Grand, Zannin East, et al. . Lung recruitment assessed by total respiratory system input reactance. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 2164–2172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

75. Dellacà RL, Zannin E, Kostic P, et al. . Optimisation of positive end-expiratory force per unit area by forced oscillation technique in a lavage model of astute lung injury. Intensive Intendance Med 2011; 37: 1021–1030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

76. Kostic P, Zannin East, Andersson Olerud M, et al. . Positive cease-expiratory pressure optimization with forced oscillation technique reduces ventilator induced lung injury: a controlled experimental written report in pigs with saline lavage lung injury. Crit Care 2011; 15: R126. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

77. Nieman GF, Satalin J, Andrews P, et al. . Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). Intensive Care Med Exp 2017; v: 8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

78. Saxton GA, Myers Chiliad. A servomechanism for automatic regulation of pulmonary ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1957; xi: 326–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

79. Tzavaras A, Weller PR. Classical approaches and intelligent systems in ventilation management: a survey. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 157–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

80. Arnal J, Nafati C, Wysocki One thousand, et al. . Utilization of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in a polyvalent intensive care unit of measurement. Intensive Care Med 2004; xxx: S84. [Google Scholar]

81. Dongelmans DA, Veelo DP, Paulus F, et al. . Weaning automation with adaptive back up ventilation: a randomized controlled trial in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 565–571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

82. Alam Yard, Jones Yard, Kahl W, et al. . Modeling the weaning of intensive care unit patients from mechanical ventilation: A review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2014; 42: 25–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

83. Laubscher TP, Heinrichs W, Weiler N, et al. . An adaptive lung ventilation controller. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994; 41: 51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

84. Dojat M, Pachet F, Guessoum Z, et al. . NéoGanesh: a working system for the automated control of assisted ventilation in ICUs. Artif Intell Med 1997; eleven: 97–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

85. Dojat Chiliad, Harf A, Touchard D, et al. . Clinical evaluation of a computer-controlled pressure support fashion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 1161–1166. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

86. Lellouche F, Mancebo J, Jolliet P, et al. . A multicenter randomized trial of computer-driven protocolized weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 894–900. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

87. Rose Fifty, Presneill JJ, Johnston L, et al. . A randomised, controlled trial of conventional versus automated weaning from mechanical ventilation using SmartCareTM/PS. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1788–1795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

88. Schädler D, Engel C, Elke Yard, et al. . Automatic control of pressure support for ventilator weaning in surgical intensive intendance patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 637–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

89. Burns KEA, Meade MO, Lessard MR, et al. . Wean Before and Automatically with New Technology (the WEAN Study). A multicenter, pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 1203–1211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


Manufactures from Exhale are provided hither courtesy of European Respiratory Order


freitasnothestal.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467868/

0 Response to "Peer Reviewed Articles on Newer Venitlation Modes 2016 2017"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel